Wallet analysis

2026-06-23T02:06:24+00:00

trader profile + honest PnL by actual resolution and NET edge after slippage — worth copying?

4.5
score
CA 0xca7e…00c4 other 5 markets active 1h ago coverage 12d
RISKYcopy with care ⚠ Small sample
✗ too few resolved markets (<12) to judge
Total PnL −$3 (-3%) realized −$3 · open +$0
Gross ROI / mkt +27% what the leader earns
−copy tax
Net edge / mkt +15% what you keep after slip
Net edge+15%after slip
Net WR60%break-even
Win rate60%3W / 2L
Drawdown56%max
Avg bet$21per market
Trades / day0.8pace
Kalshi-fit20%portable
Net worth$0now

Equity curve

realized PnL
Not enough resolved history to chart — analysis covers only 12d (hyperactive wallet — we see only the tail of its trades). A “Total PnL” curve will appear once daily tracking accumulates.

Categories

share · PnL
other 80% +$37
politics 20% −$4
Share of volume and PnL by niche (realized + unrealized). Shows where the trader actually earns — and where they bleed.

The copy-tax — evidence

gross is the leader · net is you

Net edge · by timeframe

gross → net
insufficient sample — too few resolved markets to judge
break-even: the trader needs > 10.5% gross ROI/market for the copier to break even
chance a trade nets +60%
net ROI/market (all)+15.0%
timeframemarkets gross ROINET ROI gross WRNET WR net PnL (wtd)
≤7d 4 +39.3% +26.0% 75% 75% +30.5%
≤30d 5 +27.2% +15.0% 60% 60% +18.6%
≤90d 5 +27.2% +15.0% 60% 60% +18.6%
all 5 +27.2% +15.0% 60% 60% +18.6%
<b>gross</b> = as the leader traded. <b>net</b> = what WE’d keep after slippage (we enter later, price moved). Net ROI ≤ 0 → copying loses even if the leader profits.

Slippage survival

net ROI/WR at slip
turnover0.8 tr/day
realistic slip~5%
edge survives to10%
copier slippageNET ROINET WRnet PnL (wtd)
5% ideal ← realistic here +15.0% 60% +18.6%
10% +4.0% 60% +7.3%
15% -6.0% 40% -3.1%
20% -15.2% 40% -12.6%
Realistic slippage grows with turnover and leader size. If net ROI turns negative before the realistic slip — it’s a <b>trap</b>: leader profits, you lose.

Edge quality

honest signals — luck vs skill
Profit concentration
top 64% · top 2 89% thin sample
Edge freshness (90d)
90d ROI +31% too few recent
Fragile wins
0% wins margin < slip thin sample
Flat-copyable
equal-wt +27% · $-wt +31% works when copied flat
Big bets
big-bet WR —% no data
Persistence
early —% → late —% no data
Add-ons / DCA
1.0 add-ons/market flat bettor — clean entries
Win / loss size
+$18 vs −$11 · ×1.62 wins bigger than losses
Profit factor
×2.43 per $1 lost it wins $2.43
Copy size
≥ $50 mirror leader trades ≥ this size to copy only main ideas

Supporting detail

12d coverage
Net worth$0
Realized−$3
Unrealized+$0
Win rate (resolved)60%
Wins / losses3 / 2
Open positions0
Markets (closed)5 / 5
History coverage12d
Avg bet$21
Trades / day0.8
Drawdown56%
Kalshi-fit20%

Ledger

positions · history · trades
Positions 0 History 5 Trades
no open positions (1 resolved losses — in realized PnL)
Closed markets — PnL by actual resolution, newest first
MarketwheninvestedPnLROI
Erling Haaland: 1+ goals Jun 23 $20 +$35 +172%
Kylian Mbappé: 3+ goals Jun 23 $18 −$18 -98%
Kylian Mbappé: 2+ goals Jun 23 $25 +$14 +54%
Will Argentina win on 2026-06-22? Jun 22 $19 +$6 +30%
Will Roberto Sánchez Palomino win the 2026 Peruvian presidential elect Jun 11 $21 −$4 -21%
Latest 50 closed markets. Resolution = Polymarket fact (redeemable/curPrice), not a timer.
Latest trades by this wallet
Marketsidepricesizewhen
Erling Haaland: 1+ goals SELL Yes 100¢ $55 51m
Erling Haaland: 1+ goals BUY Yes 36¢ $20 1h
Kylian Mbappé: 3+ goals BUY Yes 40¢ $18 1h
Kylian Mbappé: 2+ goals SELL Yes 100¢ $39 1h
Kylian Mbappé: 2+ goals BUY Yes 64¢ $25 4h
Will Argentina win on 2026-06-22? SELL Yes 81¢ $25 8h
Will Argentina win on 2026-06-22? BUY Yes 61¢ $19 8h
Will Roberto Sánchez Palomino win the 2026 Peruvian presidential elect SELL Yes $16 11d
Will Roberto Sánchez Palomino win the 2026 Peruvian presidential elect BUY Yes $21 11d
From the wallet’s activity history (Polymarket /activity), latest 30.
Calibrated vs Polymarket: our portfolio calc $0.00 · official $0.00 (match) · 9 history records